You have no idea - none - whether or not this affects "a majority" of users: it may well be that only 15% of subscribers are unable to get the benefit of the new denoising. ![]() ![]() Making up statistics doesn't really add to the credibility of your opinion. While Topaz Photo AI can be used by older computers. ![]() In my view when Adobe comes out with a new feature that only can be used as it should by 15% of their subscribers they should wait and work on the product till a majority of their subscribers can use this feature to its fullest before they release it.It is ridicules that only subscribers who have bought computers in the last 1.5 year can get the full benefit of Adobe Denoise. So: we either upgrade our hardware wait until the software is sufficiently optimised to meet our arbitrary expectations (which might never happen, of course) live with the longer processing times or use something else.Īscribing agendas to Adobe's imagined motivations is futile and disagree on this one. The point is that this is a simple fact of life: as software gets more and more resource intensive, we're all going to run into instances of software bogging down because it has surpassed the capabilities of the hardware it's running on. Adobe is already far ahead of DxO in performance and code optimisation terms, and we can expect that trend to continue. You mention Topaz: I know from my own experience that it runs like a dog on what constitutes "older hardware" for its requirements - the fact that it's currently faster than Lr on your machine is pretty irrelevant as a data point: it just means that its requirements more closely match your machines capabilities.Ī pure fluke, really - certainly not evidence of an evil Adobe agenda.įor further context: on my machine (which has a functional, though far from cutting-edge, GPU with 8gb of memory) files that take 15 seconds in On One Photo Raw take a minute in Lr and ten minutes in DxO PhotoLab or PureRaw. There's no call to take things personally - Adobe isn't out to get you. The simple fact is that we're talking about resource-intensive code, which Adobe will surely refine as they develop it. Than that says at lot about there attitute for there customers. For Adobe, the people who have "older hardware" (and that are most of there subscribers), are not a first priority.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |